Jinlun JL QT-50-4 vs Kymco Bet and Win 50 (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Jinlun JL QT-50-4stacks up against the Kymco Bet and Win 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Jinlun JL QT-50-4 | Kymco Bet and Win 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 2 hp | — |
| Torque | 3 Nm | 6 Nm |
| Weight | 85 kg | 120 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.2 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | — | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Jinlun JL QT-50-4 vs Kymco Bet and Win 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Jinlun JL QT-50-4 and the Kymco Bet and Win 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Jinlun JL QT-50-4 brings 2 hp in a 85 kg package, while the Kymco Bet and Win 50 counters with its own power figure at 120 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: