Kasinski Soft 50 vs HP Power Copper 50 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kasinski Soft 50stacks up against the HP Power Copper 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kasinski Soft 50 | HP Power Copper 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | — |
| Weight | 90 kg | 80 kg |
| Seat height | — | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.9 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 | 100/80-14 / 100/80-14 |
Kasinski Soft 50 vs HP Power Copper 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kasinski Soft 50 and the HP Power Copper 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kasinski Soft 50 brings 4 hp in a 90 kg package, while the HP Power Copper 50 counters with its own power figure at 80 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: