Keeway ARN 125cc vs MBK Flame X (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway ARN 125ccstacks up against the MBK Flame X. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway ARN 125cc | MBK Flame X |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 8 hp | 11 hp |
| Torque | 8 Nm | 9 Nm |
| Weight | 150 kg | 116 kg |
| Seat height | — | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Disc, ø 216 |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake). Drum, Ø 150 |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 110/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Keeway ARN 125cc vs MBK Flame X — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway ARN 125cc and the MBK Flame X usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway ARN 125cc brings 8 hp in a 150 kg package, while the MBK Flame X counters with 11 hp at 116 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: