Keeway ARN 150 vs Qlink Siena 150 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway ARN 150stacks up against the Qlink Siena 150. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway ARN 150 | Qlink Siena 150 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 150 cc | 150 cc |
| Horsepower | 10 hp | 8 hp |
| Torque | — | 9 Nm |
| Weight | 105 kg | 101 kg |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.4 L | 1.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Keeway ARN 150 vs Qlink Siena 150 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway ARN 150 and the Qlink Siena 150 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway ARN 150 brings 10 hp in a 105 kg package, while the Qlink Siena 150 counters with 8 hp at 101 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: