Keeway ARN 50 vs TGB 101R 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway ARN 50stacks up against the TGB 101R 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway ARN 50 | TGB 101R 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 48 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | — |
| Weight | 104 kg | 81 kg |
| Seat height | — | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 1.4 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Keeway ARN 50 vs TGB 101R 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway ARN 50 and the TGB 101R 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway ARN 50 brings 4 hp in a 104 kg package, while the TGB 101R 50 counters with 48 hp at 81 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: