Keeway TX50 Enduro vs Puma Falcon CR50 Cross (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Keeway TX50 Endurostacks up against the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Keeway TX50 Enduro | Puma Falcon CR50 Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 2 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | — |
| Weight | 94 kg | 108 kg |
| Seat height | — | 38 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.6 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 3.00-21 / 4.10-18 | 80/100-21 / 110/100-18 |
Keeway TX50 Enduro vs Puma Falcon CR50 Cross — which should you buy?
Picking between the Keeway TX50 Enduro and the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Keeway TX50 Enduro brings 2 hp in a 94 kg package, while the Puma Falcon CR50 Cross counters with 4 hp at 108 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: