Kreidler Florett 50 City vs Vento Zip r3i Turbocam (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler Florett 50 Citystacks up against the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler Florett 50 City | Vento Zip r3i Turbocam |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2013 |
| Price | $1,499 | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 5 hp |
| Torque | — | 9 Nm |
| Weight | 89 kg | 65 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.7 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. ABS |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 100/60-12 / 100/60-12 |
Kreidler Florett 50 City vs Vento Zip r3i Turbocam — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler Florett 50 City and the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler Florett 50 City brings 3 hp in a 89 kg package, while the Vento Zip r3i Turbocam counters with 5 hp at 65 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: