Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race vs Tank Sports Urban Econo 50 (2008)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Racestacks up against the Tank Sports Urban Econo 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race | Tank Sports Urban Econo 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2008 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 2 hp |
| Weight | 89 kg | 84 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | 28 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | 1.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/70-12 / 110/70-12 | 3.00-10 / 3.00-10 |
Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race vs Tank Sports Urban Econo 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race and the Tank Sports Urban Econo 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler Florett RMC-E 50 Race brings 4 hp in a 89 kg package, while the Tank Sports Urban Econo 50 counters with 2 hp at 84 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: