Kreidler Mustang 50 vs Barossa Mini AK3 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler Mustang 50stacks up against the Barossa Mini AK3. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler Mustang 50 | Barossa Mini AK3 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | — |
| Weight | — | 58 kg |
| Seat height | 27 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | — |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake). No front brake. |
| Tires | 19-70 / 90-70 | 45/70-6 / 45/70-6 |
Kreidler Mustang 50 vs Barossa Mini AK3 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler Mustang 50 and the Barossa Mini AK3 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler Mustang 50 brings 5 hp, while the Barossa Mini AK3 counters with its own power figure at 58 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: