Kreidler RMC-G 50 El Ninjo vs MBK Flipper (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler RMC-G 50 El Ninjostacks up against the MBK Flipper. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler RMC-G 50 El Ninjo | MBK Flipper |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 102 kg | 267 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/70-12 / 110/70-12 | 70/90-M16 / 80/90-M16 |
Kreidler RMC-G 50 El Ninjo vs MBK Flipper — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler RMC-G 50 El Ninjo and the MBK Flipper usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler RMC-G 50 El Ninjo brings 4 hp in a 102 kg package, while the MBK Flipper counters with 3 hp at 267 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: