Kreidler RMC-G 50 vs Qlink Star 50 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler RMC-G 50stacks up against the Qlink Star 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler RMC-G 50 | Qlink Star 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | — | $1,399 |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 5 Nm |
| Weight | — | 77 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.0 L | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 110/70-12 / 110/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Kreidler RMC-G 50 vs Qlink Star 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler RMC-G 50 and the Qlink Star 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler RMC-G 50 brings 4 hp, while the Qlink Star 50 counters with 3 hp at 77 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: