Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD vs Azel Sweet 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kreidler RMC-H 50 DDstacks up against the Azel Sweet 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD | Azel Sweet 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 95 kg | 96 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 2.50-17 / 2.75-17 |
Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD vs Azel Sweet 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD and the Azel Sweet 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kreidler RMC-H 50 DD brings 4 hp in a 95 kg package, while the Azel Sweet 50 counters with 4 hp at 96 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: