KTM 1050 Adventure vs Triumph Tiger (2016)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the KTM 1050 Adventurestacks up against the Triumph Tiger. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | KTM 1050 Adventure | Triumph Tiger |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2016 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 1050 cc | 1050 cc |
| Horsepower | 95 hp | 114 hp |
| Torque | — | 98 Nm |
| Weight | 212 kg | 198 kg |
| Seat height | 34 mm | 33 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 6.1 L | 5.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Double disc. ABS. Four-piston calipers. Radially mounted. Bremo | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. ABS. Two-piston calipers. Bremo. | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 120/70-ZR17 / 180/55-ZR17 |
KTM 1050 Adventure vs Triumph Tiger — which should you buy?
Picking between the KTM 1050 Adventure and the Triumph Tiger usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the KTM 1050 Adventure brings 95 hp in a 212 kg package, while the Triumph Tiger counters with 114 hp at 198 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: