Kymco 125 Pulsar CK vs MZ RT 125 (2005)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco 125 Pulsar CKstacks up against the MZ RT 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco 125 Pulsar CK | MZ RT 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2005 | 2005 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 124 cc | 124 cc |
| Horsepower | 11 hp | 11 hp |
| Torque | 10 Nm | 12 Nm |
| Weight | 131 kg | 133 kg |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 3.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 2.75-18 / 3.00-17 | 110/70-17 / 130/70-17 |
Kymco 125 Pulsar CK vs MZ RT 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco 125 Pulsar CK and the MZ RT 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco 125 Pulsar CK brings 11 hp in a 131 kg package, while the MZ RT 125 counters with 11 hp at 133 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: