Kymco Bet and Win 50 vs Jinlun JL QT-50-4 (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco Bet and Win 50stacks up against the Jinlun JL QT-50-4. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco Bet and Win 50 | Jinlun JL QT-50-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 2 hp |
| Torque | 6 Nm | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 120 kg | 85 kg |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | — |
Kymco Bet and Win 50 vs Jinlun JL QT-50-4 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco Bet and Win 50 and the Jinlun JL QT-50-4 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco Bet and Win 50 brings its published horsepower in a 120 kg package, while the Jinlun JL QT-50-4 counters with 2 hp at 85 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: