Kymco City 50 vs Peugeot V-Clic 50 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco City 50stacks up against the Peugeot V-Clic 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco City 50 | Peugeot V-Clic 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | 3 hp |
| Weight | 108 kg | 79 kg |
| Seat height | 33 mm | 28 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 1.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 100/80-16 / 120/80-16 | 3.50-10 / 3.50-10 |
Kymco City 50 vs Peugeot V-Clic 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco City 50 and the Peugeot V-Clic 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco City 50 brings 4 hp in a 108 kg package, while the Peugeot V-Clic 50 counters with 3 hp at 79 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: