Kymco Dink L-C vs Peugeot Ludix Elegance (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco Dink L-Cstacks up against the Peugeot Ludix Elegance. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco Dink L-C | Peugeot Ludix Elegance |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Torque | 6 Nm | — |
| Weight | 119 kg | 76 kg |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.5 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Single disc type, hydraulic control. Diameter of the brake piston : 32 mm Disc diameter and thickness : 190 – 3 mm |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake). Single cam drum type controlled by cable. Brake drum diameter : 110 mm Brake lining thickness : 3,8 mm |
| Tires | 110/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 100/80-10 / 100/80-10 |
Kymco Dink L-C vs Peugeot Ludix Elegance — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco Dink L-C and the Peugeot Ludix Elegance usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco Dink L-C brings its published horsepower in a 119 kg package, while the Peugeot Ludix Elegance counters with its own power figure at 76 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: