Kymco K-Pipe vs NOX KL 50 SM (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco K-Pipestacks up against the NOX KL 50 SM. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco K-Pipe | NOX KL 50 SM |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2010 |
| Price | — | $2,490 |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 2 hp | — |
| Torque | 3 Nm | — |
| Weight | — | 82 kg |
| Seat height | — | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 4-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. 2-piston |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc. 2-piston |
| Tires | 120/70-17 / 130/70-17 | 100/80-17 / 130/70-17 |
Kymco K-Pipe vs NOX KL 50 SM — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco K-Pipe and the NOX KL 50 SM usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco K-Pipe brings 2 hp, while the NOX KL 50 SM counters with its own power figure at 82 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: