Kymco MXU 300 R vs Aeon Crossland 300 (2017)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco MXU 300 Rstacks up against the Aeon Crossland 300. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco MXU 300 R | Aeon Crossland 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2017 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 271 cc | 272 cc |
| Horsepower | 19 hp | 18 hp |
| Torque | — | 22 Nm |
| Weight | 241 kg | 233 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.7 L | 3.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Double disc | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 22/7-10 / 22/10-10 | 22/7-10 / 22/10-9 |
Kymco MXU 300 R vs Aeon Crossland 300 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco MXU 300 R and the Aeon Crossland 300 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco MXU 300 R brings 19 hp in a 241 kg package, while the Aeon Crossland 300 counters with 18 hp at 233 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: