Kymco MXU 400 vs BamX BX400-U4 Sierra (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco MXU 400stacks up against the BamX BX400-U4 Sierra. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco MXU 400 | BamX BX400-U4 Sierra |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2012 |
| Price | — | $4,999 |
| Engine | 367 cc | 387 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 19 hp |
| Torque | — | 25 Nm |
| Weight | 306 kg | 266 kg |
| Seat height | 33 mm | 34 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 4.5 L | 3.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Double disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 |
Kymco MXU 400 vs BamX BX400-U4 Sierra — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco MXU 400 and the BamX BX400-U4 Sierra usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco MXU 400 brings its published horsepower in a 306 kg package, while the BamX BX400-U4 Sierra counters with 19 hp at 266 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: