Kymco MXU 400 vs Yamaha Big Bear 400 4x4 IRS (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco MXU 400stacks up against the Yamaha Big Bear 400 4x4 IRS. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco MXU 400 | Yamaha Big Bear 400 4x4 IRS |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2012 |
| Price | — | $6,599 |
| Engine | 367 cc | 386 cc |
| Weight | 306 kg | — |
| Seat height | 33 mm | 35 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 4.5 L | 4.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Double disc. Hydraulic |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Sealed multidisc |
| Tires | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 |
Kymco MXU 400 vs Yamaha Big Bear 400 4x4 IRS — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco MXU 400 and the Yamaha Big Bear 400 4x4 IRS usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco MXU 400 brings its published horsepower in a 306 kg package, while the Yamaha Big Bear 400 4x4 IRS counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: