Kymco MXU 450i vs Arctic Cat 425i SE (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco MXU 450istacks up against the Arctic Cat 425i SE. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco MXU 450i | Arctic Cat 425i SE |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2012 |
| Price | $6,099 | — |
| Engine | 443 cc | 443 cc |
| Horsepower | 33 hp | — |
| Torque | 34 Nm | — |
| Weight | 276 kg | 278 kg |
| Seat height | 32 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 4.7 L | 4.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Tires | 24/8-12 / 24/10-12 | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 |
Kymco MXU 450i vs Arctic Cat 425i SE — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco MXU 450i and the Arctic Cat 425i SE usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco MXU 450i brings 33 hp in a 276 kg package, while the Arctic Cat 425i SE counters with its own power figure at 278 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: