Kymco MXU 50 vs Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco MXU 50stacks up against the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco MXU 50 | Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 5 hp | — |
| Weight | 100 kg | 74 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 22 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 0.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | — |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 21/7-10 / 22/10-10 | 145/70-6 / 145/70-6 |
Kymco MXU 50 vs Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco MXU 50 and the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco MXU 50 brings 5 hp in a 100 kg package, while the Clipic Quad Mini Rex 50 counters with its own power figure at 74 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: