Kymco MXU 700i vs Arctic Cat 700i EFT (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Kymco MXU 700istacks up against the Arctic Cat 700i EFT. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kymco MXU 700i | Arctic Cat 700i EFT |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2012 |
| Price | $8,599 | — |
| Engine | 695 cc | 695 cc |
| Horsepower | 45 hp | — |
| Torque | 40 Nm | — |
| Weight | 357 kg | 307 kg |
| Seat height | 35 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 4.4 L | 5.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Double disc. Hydraulic. | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic. | Single disc |
| Tires | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 | 25/8-12 / 25/10-12 |
Kymco MXU 700i vs Arctic Cat 700i EFT — which should you buy?
Picking between the Kymco MXU 700i and the Arctic Cat 700i EFT usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Kymco MXU 700i brings 45 hp in a 357 kg package, while the Arctic Cat 700i EFT counters with its own power figure at 307 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: