Lem Recreational CX3 vs Rieju MRX 50 Pro (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Lem Recreational CX3stacks up against the Rieju MRX 50 Pro. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Lem Recreational CX3 | Rieju MRX 50 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | — |
| Weight | 45 kg | 94 kg |
| Seat height | 29 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 0.7 L | 2.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 1-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Galfer double piston |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc. Galfer |
| Tires | — | 80/90-21 / 110/80-18 |
Lem Recreational CX3 vs Rieju MRX 50 Pro — which should you buy?
Picking between the Lem Recreational CX3 and the Rieju MRX 50 Pro usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Lem Recreational CX3 brings 3 hp in a 45 kg package, while the Rieju MRX 50 Pro counters with its own power figure at 94 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: