Lem Recreational CX3 vs Ural Ranger (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Lem Recreational CX3stacks up against the Ural Ranger. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Lem Recreational CX3 | Ural Ranger |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | — |
| Torque | — | 2 Nm |
| Weight | 45 kg | — |
| Seat height | 29 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 0.7 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 1-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Single disc | — |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | — |
Lem Recreational CX3 vs Ural Ranger — which should you buy?
Picking between the Lem Recreational CX3 and the Ural Ranger usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Lem Recreational CX3 brings 3 hp in a 45 kg package, while the Ural Ranger counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: