Lifan Cub 50 vs WT Motors Bilbao 50 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Lifan Cub 50stacks up against the WT Motors Bilbao 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Lifan Cub 50 | WT Motors Bilbao 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | — | 3 Nm |
| Weight | 86 kg | 105 kg |
| Seat height | — | 27 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 1.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.75-13 / 3.00-13 | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 |
Lifan Cub 50 vs WT Motors Bilbao 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Lifan Cub 50 and the WT Motors Bilbao 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Lifan Cub 50 brings 3 hp in a 86 kg package, while the WT Motors Bilbao 50 counters with 3 hp at 105 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: