Lifan LF125-10K vs Puma CityFly 125 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Lifan LF125-10Kstacks up against the Puma CityFly 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Lifan LF125-10K | Puma CityFly 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 11 hp | 11 hp |
| Torque | 9 Nm | — |
| Weight | 130 kg | 78 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.2 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.75-18 / 3.00-18 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Lifan LF125-10K vs Puma CityFly 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Lifan LF125-10K and the Puma CityFly 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Lifan LF125-10K brings 11 hp in a 130 kg package, while the Puma CityFly 125 counters with 11 hp at 78 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: