LSL Clubman W 800 TR Flat Tracker vs Triumph T100 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the LSL Clubman W 800 TR Flat Trackerstacks up against the Triumph T100. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | LSL Clubman W 800 TR Flat Tracker | Triumph T100 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2003 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 773 cc | 790 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 62 hp |
| Torque | — | 60 Nm |
| Weight | — | 205 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 4.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Double disc. Galfer-Wave | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 110/80-18 / 150/70-18 | 100/90-R 19 / 130/80-R 17 |
LSL Clubman W 800 TR Flat Tracker vs Triumph T100 — which should you buy?
Picking between the LSL Clubman W 800 TR Flat Tracker and the Triumph T100 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the LSL Clubman W 800 TR Flat Tracker brings its published horsepower, while the Triumph T100 counters with 62 hp at 205 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: