Macbor ATV CX 50 vs Kymco MXU 50 (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Macbor ATV CX 50stacks up against the Kymco MXU 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Macbor ATV CX 50 | Kymco MXU 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 9 hp | 5 hp |
| Weight | — | 100 kg |
| Seat height | — | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | — |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake). Optional disc | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 21/7-10 / 22/10-10 |
Macbor ATV CX 50 vs Kymco MXU 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Macbor ATV CX 50 and the Kymco MXU 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Macbor ATV CX 50 brings 9 hp, while the Kymco MXU 50 counters with 5 hp at 100 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: