Malaguti Grizzly 4-wheels vs E-Ton Viper ST. Exl-50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Malaguti Grizzly 4-wheelsstacks up against the E-Ton Viper ST. Exl-50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Malaguti Grizzly 4-wheels | E-Ton Viper ST. Exl-50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Weight | 58 kg | 152 kg |
| Seat height | — | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 2.1 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | — | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 145/70-6 / 145/70-6 | 21/6-10 / 20/10-9 |
Malaguti Grizzly 4-wheels vs E-Ton Viper ST. Exl-50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Malaguti Grizzly 4-wheels and the E-Ton Viper ST. Exl-50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Malaguti Grizzly 4-wheels brings its published horsepower in a 58 kg package, while the E-Ton Viper ST. Exl-50 counters with its own power figure at 152 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: