MBK 350 vs Arctic Cat 350 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MBK 350stacks up against the Arctic Cat 350. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MBK 350 | Arctic Cat 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 366 cc | 366 cc |
| Weight | 267 kg | 267 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 4.3 L | 4.3 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Tires | 24/8-12 / 24/10-12 | 24/8-12 / 24/10-12 |
MBK 350 vs Arctic Cat 350 — which should you buy?
Picking between the MBK 350 and the Arctic Cat 350 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MBK 350 brings its published horsepower in a 267 kg package, while the Arctic Cat 350 counters with its own power figure at 267 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: