MBK Flame X vs Kymco Bet and Win 125 (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MBK Flame Xstacks up against the Kymco Bet and Win 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MBK Flame X | Kymco Bet and Win 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 11 hp | — |
| Torque | 9 Nm | 11 Nm |
| Weight | 116 kg | 138 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Disc, ø 216 | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake). Drum, Ø 150 | Single disc |
| Tires | 110/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
MBK Flame X vs Kymco Bet and Win 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the MBK Flame X and the Kymco Bet and Win 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MBK Flame X brings 11 hp in a 116 kg package, while the Kymco Bet and Win 125 counters with its own power figure at 138 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: