MBK Flipper vs Kreidler RMC-G 50 El Ninjo (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MBK Flipperstacks up against the Kreidler RMC-G 50 El Ninjo. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MBK Flipper | Kreidler RMC-G 50 El Ninjo |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 4 hp |
| Torque | 4 Nm | — |
| Weight | 267 kg | 102 kg |
| Seat height | 30 mm | 32 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 70/90-M16 / 80/90-M16 | 110/70-12 / 110/70-12 |
MBK Flipper vs Kreidler RMC-G 50 El Ninjo — which should you buy?
Picking between the MBK Flipper and the Kreidler RMC-G 50 El Ninjo usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MBK Flipper brings 3 hp in a 267 kg package, while the Kreidler RMC-G 50 El Ninjo counters with 4 hp at 102 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: