MBK Oceo 125 vs Keeway SilverBlade (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MBK Oceo 125stacks up against the Keeway SilverBlade. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MBK Oceo 125 | Keeway SilverBlade |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 12 hp | 12 hp |
| Torque | 12 Nm | 13 Nm |
| Weight | 159 kg | 155 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | 3.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | 100/80-16 / 120/80-16 | 120/70-14 / 140/60-14 |
MBK Oceo 125 vs Keeway SilverBlade — which should you buy?
Picking between the MBK Oceo 125 and the Keeway SilverBlade usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MBK Oceo 125 brings 12 hp in a 159 kg package, while the Keeway SilverBlade counters with 12 hp at 155 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: