MBK X-Over vs Puma Apollo 125 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MBK X-Overstacks up against the Puma Apollo 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MBK X-Over | Puma Apollo 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 125 cc | 125 cc |
| Horsepower | 9 hp | 9 hp |
| Torque | 10 Nm | — |
| Weight | 121 kg | 66 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | 30 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 1.2 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 | 3.50-8 / 3.50-8 |
MBK X-Over vs Puma Apollo 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the MBK X-Over and the Puma Apollo 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MBK X-Over brings 9 hp in a 121 kg package, while the Puma Apollo 125 counters with 9 hp at 66 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: