Mikilon D71-250 vs KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Mikilon D71-250stacks up against the KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Mikilon D71-250 | KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 249 cc | 249 cc |
| Horsepower | 17 hp | — |
| Weight | — | 106 kg |
| Seat height | 38 mm | 38 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.9 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 80/100-21 / 110/90-18 | 80/100-21 / 100/90-19 |
Mikilon D71-250 vs KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days — which should you buy?
Picking between the Mikilon D71-250 and the KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Mikilon D71-250 brings 17 hp, while the KTM 250 XCF-W Six Days counters with its own power figure at 106 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: