Motorhispania RYZ 49 Urban vs Puma Falcon CR50 Motard (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Motorhispania RYZ 49 Urbanstacks up against the Puma Falcon CR50 Motard. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Motorhispania RYZ 49 Urban | Puma Falcon CR50 Motard |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2011 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 4 hp |
| Weight | 95 kg | 107 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 38 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 2.1 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Double piston | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-16 / 120/80-16 | 110/70-17 / 140/70-17 |
Motorhispania RYZ 49 Urban vs Puma Falcon CR50 Motard — which should you buy?
Picking between the Motorhispania RYZ 49 Urban and the Puma Falcon CR50 Motard usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Motorhispania RYZ 49 Urban brings its published horsepower in a 95 kg package, while the Puma Falcon CR50 Motard counters with 4 hp at 107 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: