MZ 660 Mastiff vs Honda NC700SA (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the MZ 660 Mastiffstacks up against the Honda NC700SA. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | MZ 660 Mastiff | Honda NC700SA |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2003 | 2013 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 660 cc | 670 cc |
| Horsepower | 50 hp | 47 hp |
| Torque | 57 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Weight | 175 kg | — |
| Seat height | 33 mm | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 3.6 L | 3.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | — | Single disc. wavy hydraulic disc with 3-piston caliper and sintered metal pads |
| Rear brakes | — | Single disc. Wavy hydraulic disc with single-piston caliper and sintered metal pads |
| Tires | — | 4.50-17 / 3.50-17 |
MZ 660 Mastiff vs Honda NC700SA — which should you buy?
Picking between the MZ 660 Mastiff and the Honda NC700SA usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the MZ 660 Mastiff brings 50 hp in a 175 kg package, while the Honda NC700SA counters with 47 hp.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike:

