Pagsta Wasp 50 vs Generic ROC 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Pagsta Wasp 50stacks up against the Generic ROC 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Pagsta Wasp 50 | Generic ROC 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | 3 hp |
| Torque | 3 Nm | 4 Nm |
| Weight | 80 kg | 100 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.3 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | — |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | — |
| Tires | 3.50-10 / 3.50-10 | 120/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Pagsta Wasp 50 vs Generic ROC 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Pagsta Wasp 50 and the Generic ROC 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Pagsta Wasp 50 brings 3 hp in a 80 kg package, while the Generic ROC 50 counters with 3 hp at 100 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: