Peugeot Kisbee 50 Sportline vs HP Power Facile 50 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Peugeot Kisbee 50 Sportlinestacks up against the HP Power Facile 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Peugeot Kisbee 50 Sportline | HP Power Facile 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Weight | 95 kg | 55 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | — | 0.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | — | 3.00-12 / 3.00-12 |
Peugeot Kisbee 50 Sportline vs HP Power Facile 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Peugeot Kisbee 50 Sportline and the HP Power Facile 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Peugeot Kisbee 50 Sportline brings its published horsepower in a 95 kg package, while the HP Power Facile 50 counters with its own power figure at 55 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: