Peugeot Ludix Elegance vs Kymco Dink L-C (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Peugeot Ludix Elegancestacks up against the Kymco Dink L-C. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Peugeot Ludix Elegance | Kymco Dink L-C |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Torque | — | 6 Nm |
| Weight | 76 kg | 119 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 1.5 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Single disc type, hydraulic control. Diameter of the brake piston : 32 mm Disc diameter and thickness : 190 – 3 mm | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake). Single cam drum type controlled by cable. Brake drum diameter : 110 mm Brake lining thickness : 3,8 mm | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 100/80-10 / 100/80-10 | 110/70-12 / 130/70-12 |
Peugeot Ludix Elegance vs Kymco Dink L-C — which should you buy?
Picking between the Peugeot Ludix Elegance and the Kymco Dink L-C usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Peugeot Ludix Elegance brings its published horsepower in a 76 kg package, while the Kymco Dink L-C counters with its own power figure at 119 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: