Peugeot Vivacity 3 Sixties vs TGB Tapo RS 50 (2012)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Peugeot Vivacity 3 Sixtiesstacks up against the TGB Tapo RS 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Peugeot Vivacity 3 Sixties | TGB Tapo RS 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2012 | 2012 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | — | 5 hp |
| Weight | 90 kg | 94 kg |
| Seat height | 31 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 2.3 L | 1.8 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Peugeot Vivacity 3 Sixties vs TGB Tapo RS 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Peugeot Vivacity 3 Sixties and the TGB Tapo RS 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Peugeot Vivacity 3 Sixties brings its published horsepower in a 90 kg package, while the TGB Tapo RS 50 counters with 5 hp at 94 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: