Precision Cycle Works Agressor 300 vs American Eagle Raven (2009)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Precision Cycle Works Agressor 300stacks up against the American Eagle Raven. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Precision Cycle Works Agressor 300 | American Eagle Raven |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2009 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 1573 cc | 1573 cc |
| Weight | — | 272 kg |
| Fuel capacity | 5.0 L | — |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. 4-piston cali |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 90/90-21 / 300-18 | 90/90-21 / 180/55-18 |
Precision Cycle Works Agressor 300 vs American Eagle Raven — which should you buy?
Picking between the Precision Cycle Works Agressor 300 and the American Eagle Raven usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Precision Cycle Works Agressor 300 brings its published horsepower, while the American Eagle Raven counters with its own power figure at 272 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: