Puma Rottaler 50 Cross vs Beta RR Enduro 50 (2011)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Puma Rottaler 50 Crossstacks up against the Beta RR Enduro 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Puma Rottaler 50 Cross | Beta RR Enduro 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2011 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 4 hp | — |
| Weight | 120 kg | 85 kg |
| Seat height | 36 mm | 36 mm |
| Fuel capacity | — | 1.6 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 6-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. Hydraulic | Single disc |
| Tires | 110/70-17 / 140/70-17 | 80/90-21 / 110/80-18 |
Puma Rottaler 50 Cross vs Beta RR Enduro 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Puma Rottaler 50 Cross and the Beta RR Enduro 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Puma Rottaler 50 Cross brings 4 hp in a 120 kg package, while the Beta RR Enduro 50 counters with its own power figure at 85 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: