Qingqi QM200GY vs Keeway KXM 200 (2014)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qingqi QM200GYstacks up against the Keeway KXM 200. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qingqi QM200GY | Keeway KXM 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2008 | 2014 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 199 cc | 200 cc |
| Horsepower | 15 hp | 16 hp |
| Torque | — | 15 Nm |
| Weight | 123 kg | 137 kg |
| Seat height | — | 33 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 10.6 L | 1.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 5-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Single disc |
| Tires | — | 110/80-17 / 130/80-17 |
Qingqi QM200GY vs Keeway KXM 200 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qingqi QM200GY and the Keeway KXM 200 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qingqi QM200GY brings 15 hp in a 123 kg package, while the Keeway KXM 200 counters with 16 hp at 137 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: