Qingqi Ranger QM125-2F vs Pitster Pro Sherpa 125 (2013)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qingqi Ranger QM125-2Fstacks up against the Pitster Pro Sherpa 125. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qingqi Ranger QM125-2F | Pitster Pro Sherpa 125 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2013 | 2012 |
| Price | — | $1,699 |
| Engine | 124 cc | 124 cc |
| Torque | 9 Nm | — |
| Weight | 130 kg | 93 kg |
| Seat height | — | 29 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 4.8 L | 1.0 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | — | 4-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc. Hydraulic |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | Expanding brake (drum brake) |
| Tires | 2.75-18 / 3.00-18 | 21/7-10 / 21/7-10 |
Qingqi Ranger QM125-2F vs Pitster Pro Sherpa 125 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qingqi Ranger QM125-2F and the Pitster Pro Sherpa 125 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qingqi Ranger QM125-2F brings its published horsepower in a 130 kg package, while the Pitster Pro Sherpa 125 counters with its own power figure at 93 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: