Qlink Rave 50 vs E-Ton Matrix 50 (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink Rave 50stacks up against the E-Ton Matrix 50. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink Rave 50 | E-Ton Matrix 50 |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2010 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 49 cc | 49 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | — |
| Torque | 3 Nm | — |
| Weight | 77 kg | 101 kg |
| Seat height | — | 31 mm |
| Fuel capacity | 1.6 L | 1.7 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Front brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Rear brakes | Single disc | Single disc |
| Tires | 130/60-13 / 130/60-13 | 120/70-12 / 120/70-12 |
Qlink Rave 50 vs E-Ton Matrix 50 — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink Rave 50 and the E-Ton Matrix 50 usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink Rave 50 brings 3 hp in a 77 kg package, while the E-Ton Matrix 50 counters with its own power figure at 101 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: