Qlink X-ranger 50 vs Keeway Ranger (2007)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Qlink X-ranger 50stacks up against the Keeway Ranger. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Qlink X-ranger 50 | Keeway Ranger |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 50 cc | 50 cc |
| Horsepower | 3 hp | — |
| Torque | 3 Nm | 2 Nm |
| Weight | 60 kg | — |
| Seat height | 22 mm | — |
| Fuel capacity | 0.8 L | 0.9 L |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 3-speed | — |
| Front brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | — |
| Rear brakes | Expanding brake (drum brake) | — |
| Tires | 2.50-10 / 2.50-10 | — |
Qlink X-ranger 50 vs Keeway Ranger — which should you buy?
Picking between the Qlink X-ranger 50 and the Keeway Ranger usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Qlink X-ranger 50 brings 3 hp in a 60 kg package, while the Keeway Ranger counters with its own power figure.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike: