Redneck Titanium Lowlife vs American Eagle Falcon MS Cruiser (2010)
Side-by-side spec comparison, pricing, and a plain-English breakdown of how the Redneck Titanium Lowlifestacks up against the American Eagle Falcon MS Cruiser. Numbers pulled from manufacturer spec sheets — click either bike for the full review.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Redneck Titanium Lowlife | American Eagle Falcon MS Cruiser |
|---|---|---|
| Model year | 2010 | 2009 |
| Price | — | — |
| Engine | 1639 cc | 1639 cc |
| Weight | — | 265 kg |
| Seat height | — | 24 mm |
| Fuel type | petrol | petrol |
| Transmission | 6-speed | 5-speed |
| Front brakes | Single disc. HHI 4 Piston | Single disc. 4-piston cali |
| Rear brakes | Single disc. HHI 4 Piston | Single disc |
| Tires | 80/90-21 / 250-18 | 120/70-ZK17 / 180/55-ZR17 |
Redneck Titanium Lowlife vs American Eagle Falcon MS Cruiser — which should you buy?
Picking between the Redneck Titanium Lowlife and the American Eagle Falcon MS Cruiser usually comes down to the numbers you care about most. On paper, the Redneck Titanium Lowlife brings its published horsepower, while the American Eagle Falcon MS Cruiser counters with its own power figure at 265 kg.
Our spec tables above highlight the winning number on each line. For the full rider-focused reviews including real-world fuel economy, service costs and available colors, click into either bike:

